Submission of Abstract

Participants intending to present a paper are required to submit an extended abstract with a minimum of 500 words and not exceeding 1000 words. Abstracts should include the scope of the work, methodology and its main conclusions. Also provide the author contact details including author's position, organization, address, and email. The link for abstract submission is: https://forms.gle/VvzTusPr25a7UVmM8

Peer Review Process

As soon as the manuscript is submitted by an Author, an Editor estimates whether it matches the journal’s scope.
The Editor checks whether the manuscript has been prepared in accordance with the necessary requirements.
The papers, which do not correspond to the standard criteria, can be rejected.
Once the primary check is finished, each manuscript has to undergo a single-blind peer-review carried out by independent researchers with a relevant area of expertise.
The peer-review process is aimed at ensuring research materials of high quality and serves as a validation mechanism of scholarly publishing.
The reviewer`s report is an essential part of the process.
Having completed the reviews, all the Reviewers send the expanded reports with their own comments and suggestions to the Editor. The comments on the manuscript should be detailed, constructive and polite, not containing any personal remarks or details including the Reviewer’s name.
The Reviewers are not able to accept or reject the papers, however, their points of view and recommends are highly important and are always taken into account by the Editor, who issues the final verdict.

Paper Preparation Guidelines

When preparing your final manuscript, please pay attention to the following template:

CLICK HERE FOR PAPER TEMPLATE

Instructions for Authors

* All papers must be of high scientific quality and base on new unpublished research data.
* Corresponding author is responsible for paper preparation and all legal permissions of data used in the paper.
* Paper should be well structured, full text according to Agreement, written in acceptable English (proofread by qualified person), of international interest as well as referring latest worldwide published scientific research.
* One author can contribute to not more than two papers within one project.
* All co-authors should provide their institutional contact information (affiliation and institutional email address) in the paper according to Publisher’s template.
* Papers authorship should be in accordance with the international requirements.
* Paper keywords should characterize the main object and subject of the paper.
* Paper structure should be in accordance with the Publisher’s template.
* All references should be accordingly mentioned at the paper text.
* All previously published data used in the paper should have legal permission to us and be referred in the paper.
* Project and/or fund information should be mentioned in the Acknowledgement.
* References should be prepared in accordance with the Publisher’s template.
* Paper should refer at least five latest published scientific research in the field.
* Plagiarism, misuse, ‘salami slicing’ and misconduct are not allowed in any its form.

Conference Publishing Ethics

The presentation of an article in a conference and the publication in the corresponding conference proceedings is an important channel for exchange of information between researchers. Moreover, peer review conferences is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in a conference: the author, the conference chairman, the peer reviewer and the session organizers who play a role similar to that of co-editor in a scientific journal.

Duties of Authors * Reporting standards * Data Access and Retention * Originality and Plagiarism * Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication * Paper Revision * Authorship of the Paper * Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects * References and Acknowledgement * Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest * Fundamental errors in published works

Duties of Reviewers * Contribution to Editorial Decisions * Promptness * Confidentiality * Acceptance Criteria * Standards of Objectivity * Acknowledgement of Sources * Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Duties of publisher * Publication decisions * Fair play * Confidentiality * Disclosure and conflicts of interest * Involvement and cooperation in investigations